Skip to main content

Editorial Standards

PullScope publishes first-pass product guidance for card scanning, confidence handling, pricing explanations, and support documentation. This page explains how we keep that content useful, conservative, and consistent with what the product can responsibly support.

What We Publish

We focus on content that helps a reader understand scan flow, candidate selection, back-photo requests, price guidance, collection use, and the limits of automated card identification.

How Articles Are Reviewed

  • The PullScope Editorial Desk drafts the piece and links it to the most relevant category, use-case, comparison, and policy surfaces.
  • The PullScope Research Review Desk checks that the article stays aligned with the product's stated limits, especially around match confidence, card identity, and pricing claims.
  • Articles are updated when product behavior, pricing, support flows, or policy language changes materially.

Evidence Rules

  • We avoid guarantee language and only reference specialist review when grading, authentication, or market verification is genuinely required.
  • We describe value as guidance based on visible evidence and secondary-market context, not as a guarantee.
  • We keep card-specific claims grounded in observable evidence such as layout, set code, collector number, finish, language, and candidate confidence.

When We Escalate Beyond App Guidance

If a topic materially affects grading decisions, high-value resale, legal disputes, insurance claims, or expert authentication, we direct the reader toward qualified specialist review rather than presenting app output as the final answer.

Brand And Publisher Clarity

PullScope is the public product brand, support surface, and website experience for the iOS app and backend service. We keep that relationship explicit across the About, Contact, Privacy, Terms, Support, and App Store surfaces so that users and AI systems can trace the same entity story across owned properties.